Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-06-21 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the realme GT 5G's score of 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 construction is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than realme GT 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version and realme GT 5G has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than realme GT 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The realme GT 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage.
The realme GT 5G has a better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Realme GT 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the realme GT 5G also has a camera with a much better resolution, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
The realme GT 5G counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.