Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-21 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is slightly better than the realme GT 5G's 74.8 general score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than realme GT 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Realme GT 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme GT 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than realme GT 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixels number in each inch of screen. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better storage for games and applications than realme GT 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The realme GT 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 41% more battery size. Realme GT 5G features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme GT 5G also counts with faster video frame rate, a way bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.