Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-21 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than the realme GT 5G, with a global score of 79.5 against 74.8. The Galaxy Note7 body is just a little thinner and just a little lighter than realme GT 5G, even though it was released many years before. Realme GT 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little more vivid screen than realme GT 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than realme GT 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
Realme GT 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 29 percent more battery size. The realme GT 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the realme GT 5G also counts with a much larger sensor, a much better resolution back facing camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.