Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than realme GT 5G's general score of 74.8. The Galaxy S7 Active is a incredibly older and somewhat thicker phone than the realme GT 5G, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. The realme GT 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter screen than realme GT 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The realme GT 5G features more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Realme GT 5G features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Realme GT 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme GT 5G also counts with higher video frame rates and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.