Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-06-21 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is a bit better than realme GT 5G's 74.8 overall score. Galaxy S7 edge's construction is just a little thinner and lighter than the realme GT 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while realme GT 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some extra features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little sharper display than realme GT 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display density. Realme GT 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The realme GT 5G features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Realme GT 5G has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Realme GT 5G has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme GT 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, better video frame rate and a way larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.