Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-21 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 is a little bit better than the realme GT 5G, having an 81.7 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy S8 is an a lot older phone than realme GT 5G, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The realme GT 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme GT 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S8 features just a bit better looking screen than realme GT 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Galaxy S8 counts with a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme GT 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
The realme GT 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The realme GT 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme GT 5G also counts with higher video frame rates, a much larger sensor and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.