Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than realme GT 5G, with an 80.1 score against 74.8. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while realme GT 5G has Android 11, so it provides the user lots of additional features and optimized performance. Even though the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better phone than the realme GT 5G, we must highlight that it is also an older, notably heavier and a lot thicker phone.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than realme GT 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Realme GT 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme GT 5G also has more RAM memory.
The realme GT 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than realme GT 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in realme GT 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.