Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than realme GT 5G, with a overall score of 81 against 74.8. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also older, heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Realme GT 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little greater screen density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Realme GT 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme GT 5G also has more RAM memory. The realme GT 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way better video resolution and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory to store more games and applications than realme GT 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The realme GT 5G has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.