Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-21 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the realme GT 5G, having an 81.1 score against 74.8. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the realme GT 5G. These devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while realme GT 5G has Android 11 version.
Realme GT 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme GT 5G also has more RAM memory. Realme GT 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the realme GT 5G also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixels density.
The realme GT 5G features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size sensor and a 64 MP back-facing camera, the realme GT 5G also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than realme GT 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better battery duration than realme GT 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.