Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2780 x 1264 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than realme GT5 Pro's general score of 73.3. Both of these devices work with the same Android 14 operating system. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better screen than realme GT5 Pro, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a little worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite smaller screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processor in realme GT5 Pro, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The realme GT5 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have a camera with a 50 mega-pixels resolution and a 0.77 inches back camera sensor, the realme GT5 Pro also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Realme GT5 Pro features much more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 1 TB internal memory. Realme GT5 Pro has greater battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.