Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2780 x 1264 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than realme GT5 Pro's general score of 73.3. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid display than realme GT5 Pro, although it has a little smaller display, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little less pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50 has a much powerful processing unit than realme GT5 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The realme GT5 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the realme GT5 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Realme GT5 Pro has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory. The realme GT5 Pro counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.