Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2780 x 1264 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the realme GT5 Pro's score of 73.3. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and realme GT5 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy A50s has a bit more vivid display than realme GT5 Pro, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better performing processor than realme GT5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Realme GT5 Pro has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Realme GT5 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with more megapixels.
The realme GT5 Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.