Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2780 x 1264 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the realme GT5 Pro, having a global score of 85.5 against 73.3. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while realme GT5 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better performance than realme GT5 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A51 has a slightly better display than realme GT5 Pro, although it has a bit lower display density, a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller display. Realme GT5 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a more MP back camera, a larger aperture, a way higher video resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
Realme GT5 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A51, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory. The realme GT5 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 32 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.