Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a global score of 83.3, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. The iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while realme X3 SuperZoom comes with Android 10 operating system. The iPhone 11 is a a bit thinner and a little lighter phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, even when they were only released 9 months apart.
Apple iPhone 11 counts with a little better processing power than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 11 has a display that's very similar to the display in realme X3 SuperZoom, although the iPhone 11 has a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792px.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than iPhone 11, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much higher resolution camera and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has longer battery life than iPhone 11, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3110mAh.
Apple iPhone 11 is way more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.