Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 88.7 score against 72.6. Apple iPhone 12's construction is thinner and lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, although both were released with only a couple months difference. Apple iPhone 12 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and realme X3 SuperZoom comes with Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 12 counts with a bit faster CPU than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 12 features a much better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone 12, because it has a 49% more battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes a lot better photos and videos than iPhone 12, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
IPhone 12 is way more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.