Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 14.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 mini has a general score of 88.5, which is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Apple iPhone 12 mini comes with iOS 14.x OS, while realme X3 SuperZoom counts with Android 10 OS. Even though the Apple iPhone 12 mini and realme X3 SuperZoom were released only 5 months apart, the Apple iPhone 12 mini is way lighter and thinner.
The iPhone 12 mini has a more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. Apple iPhone 12 mini counts with a bit superior processing unit than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores and 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a greater camera than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has an 89 percent greater battery capacity.
The iPhone 12 mini is way more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.