Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while realme X3 SuperZoom counts with Android 10 operating system. Even though iPhone 12 Pro and realme X3 SuperZoom were only released 5 months apart, iPhone 12 Pro is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
IPhone 12 Pro has a better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1170 x 2532px resolution and a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of screen. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro and realme X3 SuperZoom both have incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have the same internal storage capacity.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 49% greater battery capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior camera than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much better resolution camera.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.