Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. IPhone 12 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and realme X3 SuperZoom comes with Android 10 operating system. Although the iPhone 12 Pro Max and the realme X3 SuperZoom were only released with a couple of months difference, the iPhone 12 Pro Max body is heavier but thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a brighter screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a bit bigger screen, a slightly better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a little bit higher pixels count in each inch of screen. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a bit superior CPU than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as the realme X3 SuperZoom, both of them have the same internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better battery duration than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.