Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a global score of 93.3 against 72.6. Although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is just a bit heavier than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's thinner and also newer. Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while realme X3 SuperZoom works with Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a superior CPU than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 13 Pro has a much better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
IPhone 13 Pro's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
The iPhone 13 Pro costs a lot more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.