Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while realme X3 SuperZoom comes with Android 10 operating system. IPhone 13 Pro Max's construction is newer and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom's, although it is heavier.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a little bigger display, a bit higher 1284 x 2778 resolution and a just a bit higher display density. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better processing unit than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a greater camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to realme X3 SuperZoom's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit better battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery size.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max costs a lot more money than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.