Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a 95.6 score against 72.6. The iPhone 14 Pro is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is also a little heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x OS, while realme X3 SuperZoom comes with Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 14 Pro features a faster processing unit than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 14 Pro features a much better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels and a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The realme X3 SuperZoom takes much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. IPhone 14 Pro's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to realme X3 SuperZoom's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has greater battery lifetime than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 31 percent more battery capacity.
IPhone 14 Pro costs a lot more money than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.