Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a 94.9 score against 72.6. IPhone 14 Pro Max's construction is much newer and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom's, although it's heavier. IPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x operating system, while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a faster CPU than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a slightly better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a quite larger screen, a little better pixels density and a quite better 1290 x 2796 resolution.
IPhone 14 Pro Max and realme X3 SuperZoom feature really similar memory for games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a bit superior battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4323mAh battery size. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better camera than iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.