Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 9.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s has an overall score of 83, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. IPhone 6s's construction is thinner and extremely lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x operating system, while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 6s has a bit better processing power than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processing unit. Apple iPhone 6s counts with a little more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it has a lot smaller display, a just a bit lower pixel quantity in each display inch and a much lower 1334 x 750 resolution.
IPhone 6s's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, they have the same internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a lot better camera than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger aperture, faster video frame rate, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a really longer battery duration than iPhone 6s, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 1715mAh.
The iPhone 6s is way more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.