Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 9.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s Plus is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a score of 84.2 against 72.6. Apple iPhone 6s Plus has iOS 9.x operating system, while realme X3 SuperZoom works with Android 10 operating system. Apple iPhone 6s Plus is an older phone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but Apple made it just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
Apple iPhone 6s Plus has a bit more powerful processing unit than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a GPU. IPhone 6s Plus counts with a more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger aperture for better photos in low light environments, faster video frame rate, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The iPhone 6s Plus features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a superior battery performance than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 2750mAh.
The iPhone 6s Plus is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.