Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 7 has a general score of 81.6, which is better than realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. The iPhone 7 body is extremely lighter and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 4 years before. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better looking display than iPhone 7, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch of display and a way bigger screen.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better hardware performance than iPhone 7, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 6 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 7 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a superior battery performance than iPhone 7, because it has a 114 percent larger battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes way better pictures and videos than iPhone 7, and although they both have the same video quality and a same size camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, higher video frame rate and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.