Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is way better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a score of 87.1 against 72.6. IPhone 8 Plus's body has the same weight than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's somewhat thinner. IPhone 8 Plus features just a bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little faster processor than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less RAM and 2 lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
The iPhone 8 Plus has a superior storage for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a superior battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
IPhone 8 Plus is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.