Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a lot better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. The Apple iPhone X design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone X has just a bit better performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X counts with a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. IPhone X features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 55 percent larger battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone X is a lot more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.