Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. Apple iPhone XR is an older phone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone XR counts with a display that is just as good as the screen in realme X3 SuperZoom, although the Apple iPhone XR has a little worse pixels density, a bit smaller display and a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792.
Apple iPhone XR has a bit faster processing unit than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes much clearer photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone XR is a lot more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.