Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Apple iPhone XS's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit over a year before. The Apple iPhone XS has just a bit better processing power than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XS counts with a little sharper screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a greater camera than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos and a camera with way more megapixels.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the realme X3 SuperZoom, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.