Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Blue and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a global score of 81.1 against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Google Nexus 6 is an a lot older and thicker cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Google managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and more processing cores.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rate, a larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a much better resolution. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features longer battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 30% bigger battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as realme X3 SuperZoom. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Nexus 6, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.