Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Although Google Pixel is extremely older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is just a bit thinner and a lot lighter. Google Pixel counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in realme X3 SuperZoom, because although the Google Pixel has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel and realme X3 SuperZoom count with really similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both have equal internal storage capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos, faster 60 fps video frame rate, a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Google Pixel not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.