Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Even though the Google Pixel 2 XL is incredibly older than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a greater camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same aperture and the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and better video frame rates.
The realme X3 SuperZoom and the Google Pixel 2 XL both have similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have equal 128 GB internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.