Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. The Google Pixel 3 body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a way bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.