Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released around 20 months before. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 4 GB more RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom has better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.