Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it provides you lots of additional features. Google Pixel 3a's body is just a little thinner and notably lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released just a bit further than a year before.
Realme X3 SuperZoom and Google Pixel 3a both have really similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster video frame rates, a way larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.