Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. These phones have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a XL has a more recent 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing you a lot of extra features. Google Pixel 3a XL's design is lighter and just a little thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released around a year before.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much bigger camera sensor, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.