Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 81.9 score against 72.6. Although Google Pixel 4 and realme X3 SuperZoom were released with only a few months difference, Google Pixel 4 is just a bit thinner and lighter. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with better video frame rates, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos.
Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.