Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a general score of 82.9 against 72.6. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL and realme X3 SuperZoom were released only 7 months apart, Google Pixel 4 XL is a little lighter and just a little thinner. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a higher pixels number in each screen inch. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates, a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL costs more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.