Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Just black |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with an 82.9 score against 72.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 4a body is way lighter and just a bit thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even when both were only released with a couple of months difference.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 4a has as much storage for games and applications as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom has better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3140mAh. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, higher video frame rates and a camera with way more mega pixels.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4a is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.