Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a lot better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is a little thinner and lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though they were only released 6 months apart.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and realme X3 SuperZoom feature quite similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch of display. Google Pixel 4a 5G's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's one, both have equal internal memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.