Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is way better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Google Pixel 5 is a thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even when they were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 5 has a screen that's just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's screen, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 5 and realme X3 SuperZoom have very similar storage for apps and games, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 5. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a back camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
The Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.