Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro has a general score of 77, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. The Honor 50 Pro is a newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom. These phones have Android operating system, but the Honor 50 Pro has 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing some extra features.
The Honor 50 Pro features a bit sharper screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a little bit bigger display, a bit higher 1236 x 2676 resolution and a quite greater pixels density. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster processing unit than Honor 50 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better camera than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photography. The Honor 50 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.