Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 399 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a score of 92.1 against 72.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has newer 14 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing a couple additional features. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a somewhat heavier device than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both have the same thickness.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a little better hardware performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a way better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a quite better 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and a little greater pixel density.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a much smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 1 TB internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has superior battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design costs a lot more money than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.