Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a 77.7 score against 72.6. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. Even though HTC One M9 is extremely older and just a bit thicker than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is still noticeably lighter.
HTC One M9 has a little faster CPU than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit processing unit. The HTC One M9 counts with a much better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot larger sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a camera with way more megapixels, better video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, HTC One M9 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.