Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a general score of 77 against 72.6. The HTC U Ultra is an noticeably older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but HTC managed to build it somewhat thinner and lighter. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
HTC U Ultra has just a bit better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The HTC U Ultra has much more memory capacity for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes a lot better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you prefer to save some money, you can get realme X3 SuperZoom, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.