Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has an overall score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. HTC U11's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released many years before. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 4 GB more RAM.
The HTC U11 counts with a little bit better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher display pixel density. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a lot better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a back camera with a way higher resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The HTC U11 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.