Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-01-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 775.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro is slightly better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 78.7 score against 72.6. Huawei Mate 9 Pro is an a lot older cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Huawei managed to make it somewhat thinner and lighter. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Huawei Mate 9 Pro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a little more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processing power than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom captures way better pictures and videos than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, and although they both have the same video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor, a much better resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both have the same internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better battery performance than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Huawei Mate 9 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy realme X3 SuperZoom, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.