Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G5 is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a overall score of 76.1 against 72.6. These devices use Android operating system, but the LG G5 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features. The LG G5 body is noticeably lighter and thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
LG G5 has a slightly better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better number of pixels per inch of display. LG G5 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little better hardware performance than LG G5, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a way better battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes greater photographs and videos than LG G5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a camera in the back with much more megapixels and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
LG G5 costs more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.