Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. LG G7 Fit is an older cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS, but the LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
The LG G7 Fit has a much better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater number of pixels per display inch. LG G7 Fit features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 GB more RAM and more cpu cores. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments, a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.