Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a global score of 81 against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features. The LG G7 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but LG made it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way more MP camera in the back.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 40 percent greater battery capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.